What’s wrong with the “classic” SaaS VP Sales model?

Efficient revenue growth is king for a B2B SaaS scaleup valuation and building organically the right VP Sales and Revenue Leadership should be a must have as soon as it becomes appropriate.

Why Sales VPs have such low tenure?

70% of SaaS First VP Sales don’t make it to 12 Months. It’s one of the most common, and also most devastating mishires in startups.” 2013 quote by Jason Lemkin and it seems still actual today.

Survey of Pavilion (formerly Revenue Collective) found out that the average tenure for commercial leaders has fallen under 18 months for growth companies, in both US and EU. Other industry sources show the same kind of insight as well.

What kind of impact an Executive can generate in such a short timeframe?

In mainland Europe it’s more and more common to see high-growth scaleups 1-5 million € in ARR raising decent A rounds (or “small” B rounds) between 5 and 15 million € from VCs and going all in for that superstar VP that can solve everything: the Maradona or Michael Jordan of Sales VPs.

Two examples of scaleups I’ve known from direct experience in 2 different continental Europe countries.

First scaleup: move “Maradona” from overseas 

CEO of B2B SaaS selling into Middle Market / Enterprise. Good product. Proven product-market fit. Raised more than 10 million at the end of 2017/start 2018. Hired and moved a “Maradona” VP Sales from UK (with family) in mid 2018 then fired the VP in less than a year (poor results, poor cultural fit). VP replaced with internal solution. Not worked. Revenue engine in trouble. Have a look at the Linkedin trend of company headcounts.


Second scaleup: go for the big leagues, US and UK

CEO of Marketing and Media tech. Good and early mover product. Proven product-market fit. Raised A round of around 9M$ at the end of 2018. Built straight away offices in London and New York and hired “Maradona”. Fired “Maradona”, hired “Michael Jordan”. Fired “Michael Jordan”. From second half 2019 they seem in trouble.


Not uncommon cases, is it so?

What can be the consequences for these two scaleups (ex-scaleups?):

  • Founder dreams at high risk of failure.
  • Founder dilution on the next rounds (if existing VCs decide to support).
  • Equity valuation down for everyone.
  • Hundreds of thousands € in management, operational and opportunity costs.
  • Unhappy VCs and unhappy team.

Why is this happening?

I believe for one or more of the following reasons.



Are you ready for a Sales VP “Maradona” or “Michael Jordan”? 

Would you hire Michael Jordan at the best of his career if your basketball court was still under construction?

The two companies, like many, were not ready to push so hard. They were missing fundamental go-to-market “postures” in order to prepare the company to sustain the growth.

Before hiring the “right” VP the Founders have got work of “Fundamentals” to do.

If you are not ready, you are not ready.

A good and experienced VP cannot be a shortcut. It does not work. Almost never.

The enlightened CEO of the new reality must set and own the basic “Pillars” of the revenue engine before hiring the “right” VP:

  • Find a winning pitch and consolidate the effective answer to the main sales objections.
  • Build a straight-to-the-point product marketing toolkit.
  • Don’t destroy value through “too-cheap” prices.
  • Build and make the team execute a Playbook with a simple and solid process.
  • Validate a basic funnel and conversion KPI’s.
  • Get a few sales reps consistently on quota and a small SDR team getting good First Meetings in agenda.

A great VP knows how to improve everything, go into the details and accelerate revenue. She will, but it needs to be the right moment.

To set basic and healthy “postures” must be your job.



Nine women cannot have a baby in one month

You could also hire a “Maradona” VP if you are not ready, but then be wary of the possible expectations you can reasonably set.

If you do not have revenue predictability yet, the expectation towards the VP should be set in terms of building that predictability.

Don’t expect to get delivered high-growth revenue. Unless your product has got some kind of magic and if yes, until when?.

Targets you should set instead:

  • A funnel that works and significant conversion metrics.
  • A qualified pipeline of meetings and opportunities with solid criteria.
  • Clear and measurable milestones to make progresses towards predictability.
  • Alignment with the Board around the milestones.

It happens often, especially with junior VP hires, that the CEO just assigns a sales (or revenue) target to the VP without any rational and fact-based criteria.

Guess what happens most of the times.

Don’t do that.



Would you let a trucker drive your spaceship?

No you wouldn’t, right?

So, don’t hire Leaders that only worked in big corporations (Google, Amazon etc are big corporations now) and expect them to be superstar VPs in a supersonic scaleup of 50-100 employees growing 3 digits year on year.

Even if the person is really valid, it takes time to adjust.

It took more than 2 years to me.

Would you let someone drive your Ferrari as soon as they got the driving license?

It’s more and more common that promising startups with initial revenue traction (let’s say 500K-1,000 in ARR) raise 1 to 5 million € in VC capital and rush to hire as VP Sales a young Sales Pro with very limited or no real leadership experience. Most of the time the VP fails and burns out in a year or so.

Please don’t tell me that this is part of the risk associated to running a startup because it is not. This is a burst of talent and value.



You don’t win the league hiring “Michael Jordan” and leaving him to do all the job just because he’s so expensive.

A revenue leader is a huge investment for a scaleup.

As CEO you should treat her onboarding as a top priority and learn how to do it properly. If it’s your first time you should ask for help.

How to manage the recruiting phase and the interviews. This is not like hiring an individual sales contributor or any other manager in IT, Product or Engineering.

Some of the key elements of the process you should master as Founder and CEO are:

  • Setting the appropriate expectations.
  • Uncovering the hidden truths.
  • Building routines of work together.
  • Building a win-win compensation scheme.

That’s just the start and it would help building a rewarding and positive relation.


I don’t believe the saas VP sales model is broken.

I believe that the “classic” approach does not work everywhere, especially when you scale from continental Europe and also need to prioritize efficiency before growth.

If you are not in the same position of companies like Gong, Drift, Outreach and others that raised big B rounds, C-D rounds of hundreds of millions of dollars, you should watch out .

The one-size-fits-all approach driven by the US best practices can be dangerous.

Otherwise you may run the risk to become like the guy of this song who thinks to be cool but as a matter of fact he’s out of context.

More posts to come about the topic. Stay tuned.


If you enjoyed this post, you will also like Game Plan for a Healthy Go-To-Market in B2B SaaS and How VCs should deal with the fear of “write-off” and Mentor, Advisor, Consultant, Operational Coach. Who they are. What they do. What you need.

If you found the content interesting please share with your network on Linkedin and Twitter.

Note: this article was originally published at the end of 2020 and refreshed in mid 2021.


Recent post

How to deal with the fear of devaluation, write-off or survival without exit

The VC industry was hotter than ever in 2021 and everyone invested in future Unicorns and Decacorns. These are the…

The Fundamentals of Go-To-Market Playbooks

I wrote a Linkedin post in Summer 2023 to share a few thoughts about Go-To-Market (GTM) Playbooks, in which I…

How the most valuable consumer brands become SaaS-like “true” Customer-Centric organisations

Key points of this post: To accelerate growth the most valuable companies are adopting SaaS-like (Software as a Service) go-to-market…